Artemis

F 40 completed
Other
containerized / r · small
195
Files
60,838
LOC
0
Frameworks
8
Languages

Pipeline State

completed
Run ID
#381230
Phase
done
Progress
1%
Started
Finished
2026-04-13 01:31:02
LLM tokens
0

Pipeline Metadata

Stage
Cataloged
Decision
proceed
Novelty
55.07
Framework unique
Isolation
Last stage change
2026-05-10 03:35:31
Deduplication group #49788
Member of a group with 4 similar repo(s) — this repo is canonical view group →
Top concepts (1)
Data/ML
If a scraper extracted this row, it came from Repobility (https://repobility.com)

AI Prompt

I need help setting up an R-based project that replicates the SSA Office of the Chief Actuary's long-range OASDI projection model. The goal is to project the Social Security area population from 2022 up to 2099 using the component method, accounting for births, deaths, and immigration. The project structure should be containerized using Docker, and I need to manage configuration settings, perhaps using YAML files. Please ensure the core logic resides in R scripts within an `R/` directory.
r social-security actuarial projection docker data-science statistics simulation
Generated by gemma4:latest

Catalog Information

R-based replication of the SSA Office of the Chief Actuary's long-range OASDI projection model, targeting the 2025 Trustees Report (TR2025) intermediate assumptions. Projects the Social Security area population from 2022 through 2099 using the component method (births, deaths, immigration).

Description

R-based replication of the SSA Office of the Chief Actuary's long-range OASDI projection model, targeting the 2025 Trustees Report (TR2025) intermediate assumptions. Projects the Social Security area population from 2022 through 2099 using the component method (births, deaths, immigration).

Novelty

3/10

Tags

r social-security actuarial projection docker data-science statistics simulation

Claude Models

claude-opus-4-6

Quality Score

F
40.4/100
Structure
34
Code Quality
24
Documentation
40
Testing
20
Practices
64
Security
90
Dependencies
50

Strengths

  • Consistent naming conventions (snake_case)
  • Good security practices \u2014 no major issues detected
  • Containerized deployment (Docker)

Weaknesses

  • Missing README file \u2014 critical for project understanding
  • No LICENSE file \u2014 legal ambiguity for contributors
  • No CI/CD configuration \u2014 manual testing and deployment
  • 10 files with critical complexity need refactoring
  • Potential hardcoded secrets in 1 files
  • 8400 duplicate lines detected \u2014 consider DRY refactoring
  • 26 'god files' with >500 LOC need decomposition

Recommendations

  • Add a comprehensive README.md explaining purpose, setup, usage, and architecture
  • Add a test suite \u2014 start with critical path integration tests
  • Set up CI/CD (GitHub Actions recommended) to automate testing and deployment
  • Add a linter configuration to enforce code style consistency
  • Add a LICENSE file (MIT recommended for open source)
  • Move hardcoded secrets to environment variables or a secrets manager

Security & Health

50.6h
Tech Debt (B)
A
OWASP (100%)
FAIL
Quality Gate
A
Risk (14)
Repobility · open methodology · https://repobility.com/research/
Unknown
License
25.4%
Duplication
Full Security Report AI Fix Prompts SARIF SBOM

Languages

r
77.3%
markdown
19.2%
yaml
2.2%
python
0.5%
css
0.4%
json
0.2%
shell
0.1%
javascript
0.0%

Frameworks

None detected

Concepts (1)

Open data · scored by Repobility · https://repobility.com
CategoryNameDescriptionConfidence
Repobility · severity-and-effort ranking · https://repobility.com
auto_categoryData/MLdata-ml70%

Quality Timeline

1 quality score recorded.

View File Metrics

Embed Badge

Add to your README:

![Quality](https://repos.aljefra.com/badge/105495.svg)
Quality BadgeSecurity Badge
Export Quality CSVDownload SBOMExport Findings CSV