Rtw
C 69 completed
Other
unknown / scala · tiny
36
Files
613
LOC
0
Frameworks
4
Languages
Pipeline State
completedRun ID
#1536729Phase
doneProgress
0%Started
2026-04-16 17:33:19Finished
2026-04-16 17:33:19LLM tokens
0Pipeline Metadata
Stage
CatalogedDecision
proceedNovelty
21.44Framework unique
—Isolation
—Last stage change
2026-05-10 03:35:10Deduplication group #52856
Member of a group with 35 similar repo(s) — canonical #1539263 view group →
Repobility · severity-and-effort ranking · https://repobility.com
AI Prompt
Create a Scala library, similar to the RTW concept, designed for building data pipelines in architectures that separate read and write databases, like Amazon RDS clusters. The library should enforce distinct stages for reading, transforming, and writing data. I need methods like `onReadStage`, `onTransformStage`, and `onWriteStage` within a main pipeline trait. The goal is to make the operation context—read-only, write, or no DB connection—visible in the code structure. Please include examples showing how to chain these stages together to process data.
scala library data-pipeline database read-write architecture functional
Generated by gemma4:latest
Catalog Information
Create a Scala library, similar to the RTW concept, designed for building data pipelines in architectures that separate read and write databases, like Amazon RDS clusters. The library should enforce distinct stages for reading, transforming, and writing data. I need methods like onReadStage, onTransformStage, and onWriteStage within a main pipeline trait. The goal is to make the operation context—read-only, write, or no DB connection—visible in the code structure. Please include examples s
Tags
scala library data-pipeline database read-write architecture functional
Quality Score
C
69.1/100
Structure
63
Code Quality
90
Documentation
65
Testing
15
Practices
80
Security
100
Dependencies
50
Strengths
- CI/CD pipeline configured (github_actions)
- Consistent naming conventions (PascalCase)
- Low average code complexity — well-structured code
- Good security practices — no major issues detected
- Properly licensed project
Weaknesses
- No tests found — high risk of regressions
Recommendations
- Add a test suite — start with critical path integration tests
- Add a linter configuration to enforce code style consistency
Languages
Frameworks
None detected
Embed Badge
Add to your README:
