Solana Zig
C 62 completed
Other
unknown / zig · tiny
37
Files
2,270
LOC
0
Frameworks
6
Languages
Pipeline State
completedRun ID
#1406997Phase
doneProgress
0%Started
2026-04-16 06:14:18Finished
2026-04-16 06:14:18LLM tokens
0Pipeline Metadata
Stage
SkippedDecision
skip_scaffold_dupNovelty
20.51Framework unique
—Isolation
—Last stage change
2026-04-16 18:15:42Deduplication group #49193
Member of a group with 43 similar repo(s) — canonical #1591863 view group →
Repobility's GitHub App fixes findings like these · https://github.com/apps/repobility-bot
🧪 Code Distillation
Browse all specs →AI Prompt
Create a Zig implementation library for Solana capabilities, aiming to mirror the semantics of the Rust SDK. I need core structures like `Pubkey`, `Signature`, and `Keypair`, along with types for transactions such as `Instruction` and `VersionedTransaction`. The library should include an `RpcClient` capable of performing common RPC calls like `getLatestBlockhash`, `getAccountInfo`, `getBalance`, `simulateTransaction`, and `sendTransaction`. It should also feature an injectable transport abstraction for testing. Please structure the project to handle both off-chain SDK foundations and plan for future on-chain semantics.
zig solana blockchain rpc sdk zig-lang crypto zig-build
Generated by gemma4:latest
Catalog Information
Create a Zig implementation library for Solana capabilities, aiming to mirror the semantics of the Rust SDK. I need core structures like Pubkey, Signature, and Keypair, along with types for transactions such as Instruction and VersionedTransaction. The library should include an RpcClient capable of performing common RPC calls like getLatestBlockhash, getAccountInfo, getBalance, simulateTransaction, and sendTransaction. It should also feature an injectable transport abstract
Tags
zig solana blockchain rpc sdk zig-lang crypto zig-build
Quality Score
C
61.8/100
Structure
57
Code Quality
88
Documentation
50
Testing
15
Practices
71
Security
80
Dependencies
70
Strengths
- CI/CD pipeline configured (github_actions)
- Consistent naming conventions (snake_case)
Weaknesses
- No LICENSE file — legal ambiguity for contributors
- No tests found — high risk of regressions
- Potential hardcoded secrets in 2 files
- 220 duplicate lines detected — consider DRY refactoring
- 1 'god files' with >500 LOC need decomposition
Recommendations
- Add a test suite — start with critical path integration tests
- Add a linter configuration to enforce code style consistency
- Add a LICENSE file (MIT recommended for open source)
- Move hardcoded secrets to environment variables or a secrets manager
Languages
Frameworks
None detected
Symbols
function1
Embed Badge
Add to your README:
