Semana Ia
C 69 completed
Other
unknown / csharp · small
117
Files
14,235
LOC
0
Frameworks
5
Languages
Pipeline State
completedRun ID
#1417107Phase
doneProgress
0%Started
2026-04-16 06:56:15Finished
2026-04-16 06:56:15LLM tokens
0Pipeline Metadata
Stage
SkippedDecision
skip_scaffold_dupNovelty
25.00Framework unique
—Isolation
—Last stage change
2026-04-16 18:15:42Deduplication group #47290
Member of a group with 891 similar repo(s) — canonical #1593288 view group →
Repobility — the code-quality scanner for AI-generated software · https://repobility.com
🧪 Code Distillation
Browse all specs →AI Prompt
Create a Proof of Concept (POC) in C# to generate XML for NFS-e. The system should take input from an OpenAPI/YAML contract, XSD schemas, and existing business rules. The core flow needs to demonstrate an evolution towards a more testable architecture: request -> mapper -> canonical model -> XML builders -> final XML. Initially, focus on handling `infDPS`, `prest`, `toma`, `serv`, and `valores`. Please integrate the XBuilder technology for the XML generation step, following the flow: request -> mapper -> canonical model -> XBuilder XML builder -> final XML.
csharp xml openapi yaml xsd poc nfs-e serialization architecture
Generated by gemma4:latest
Catalog Information
Create a Proof of Concept (POC) in C# to generate XML for NFS-e. The system should take input from an OpenAPI/YAML contract, XSD schemas, and existing business rules. The core flow needs to demonstrate an evolution towards a more testable architecture: request -> mapper -> canonical model -> XML builders -> final XML. Initially, focus on handling infDPS, prest, toma, serv, and valores. Please integrate the XBuilder technology for the XML generation step, following the flow: request ->
Tags
csharp xml openapi yaml xsd poc nfs-e serialization architecture
Quality Score
C
68.6/100
Structure
64
Code Quality
72
Documentation
48
Testing
70
Practices
73
Security
90
Dependencies
80
Strengths
- Good test coverage (103% test-to-source ratio)
- Good security practices — no major issues detected
Weaknesses
- No LICENSE file — legal ambiguity for contributors
- No CI/CD configuration — manual testing and deployment
- 3 files with critical complexity need refactoring
- Potential hardcoded secrets in 1 files
- 378 duplicate lines detected — consider DRY refactoring
- 1 'god files' with >500 LOC need decomposition
Recommendations
- Set up CI/CD (GitHub Actions recommended) to automate testing and deployment
- Add a linter configuration to enforce code style consistency
- Add a LICENSE file (MIT recommended for open source)
- Move hardcoded secrets to environment variables or a secrets manager
Languages
Frameworks
None detected
Symbols
function7
variable7
type_alias1
Embed Badge
Add to your README:
