Mipverify.Jl

B+ 88 completed
Other
unknown / markdown · small
90
Files
9,560
LOC
0
Frameworks
5
Languages

Pipeline State

completed
Run ID
#391635
Phase
done
Progress
1%
Started
Finished
2026-04-13 01:31:02
LLM tokens
0

Pipeline Metadata

Stage
Skipped
Decision
skip_scaffold_dup
Novelty
36.17
Framework unique
Isolation
Last stage change
2026-04-16 18:15:42
Deduplication group #47250
Member of a group with 2 similar repo(s) — canonical #110064 view group →
Top concepts (2)
Project DescriptionDocumentation
Repobility · code-quality intelligence platform · https://repobility.com

AI Prompt

Create a Julia package called MIPVerify.jl designed for evaluating the robustness of neural networks using Mixed Integer Programming (MIP). The tool should allow users to determine the minimum adversarial distortion or the adversarial test accuracy for a given test input. Include documentation and examples, perhaps using Jupyter notebooks, to guide users through installation and usage, referencing the companion repository for model loading examples.
julia mip machine-learning neural-networks robustness optimization package
Generated by gemma4:latest

Catalog Information

[pkgeval-img]: https://juliaci.github.io/NanosoldierReports/pkgeval_badges/M/MIPVerify.svg [pkgeval-url]: https://juliaci.github.io/NanosoldierReports/pkgeval_badges/M/MIPVerify.html

Description

[pkgeval-img]: https://juliaci.github.io/NanosoldierReports/pkgeval_badges/M/MIPVerify.svg [pkgeval-url]: https://juliaci.github.io/NanosoldierReports/pkgeval_badges/M/MIPVerify.html

Novelty

3/10

Tags

julia mip machine-learning neural-networks robustness optimization package

Claude Models

claude-opus-4-6

Quality Score

B+
88.2/100
Structure
89
Code Quality
100
Documentation
73
Testing
85
Practices
78
Security
100
Dependencies
60

Strengths

  • CI/CD pipeline configured (github_actions)
  • Good test coverage (3500% test-to-source ratio)
  • Consistent naming conventions (snake_case)
  • Low average code complexity \u2014 well-structured code
  • Good security practices \u2014 no major issues detected
  • Properly licensed project

Recommendations

  • Add a linter configuration to enforce code style consistency

Security & Health

4.1h
Tech Debt (B)
A
OWASP (100%)
PASS
Quality Gate
A
Risk (1)
Citation: Repobility (2026). State of AI-Generated Code. https://repobility.com/research/
MIT
License
0.0%
Duplication
Full Security Report AI Fix Prompts SARIF SBOM

Languages

markdown
68.5%
yaml
21.4%
toml
6.6%
text
2.2%
shell
1.3%

Frameworks

None detected

Concepts (2)

Repobility analysis · methodology at https://repobility.com/research/
CategoryNameDescriptionConfidence
All rows scored by the Repobility analyzer (https://repobility.com)
auto_descriptionProject Description![CI](https://github.com/vtjeng/MIPVerify.jl/actions?query=workflow%3ACI+branch%3Amaster) [![PkgEval][pkgeval-img]][pkgeval-url] ![code coverage](http://codecov.io/github/vtjeng/MIPVerify.jl?branch=master)80%
auto_categoryDocumentationdocs70%

Quality Timeline

1 quality score recorded.

View File Metrics

Embed Badge

Add to your README:

![Quality](https://repos.aljefra.com/badge/115966.svg)
Quality BadgeSecurity Badge
Export Quality CSVDownload SBOMExport Findings CSV