Push Sdk Android
D 56 completed
Other
unknown / kotlin · tiny
17
Files
920
LOC
0
Frameworks
3
Languages
Pipeline State
completedRun ID
#1459525Phase
doneProgress
0%Started
2026-04-16 09:49:38Finished
2026-04-16 09:49:38LLM tokens
0Pipeline Metadata
Stage
SkippedDecision
skip_scaffold_dupNovelty
16.40Framework unique
—Isolation
—Last stage change
2026-04-16 18:15:42Deduplication group #47376
Member of a group with 189 similar repo(s) — canonical #1527937 view group →
Want this analysis on your repo? https://repobility.com/scan/
🧪 Code Distillation
Browse all specs →AI Prompt
Create an Android push notification SDK wrapper using Kotlin. I need functionality to handle device registration, manage FCM token setting, and support various push notification actions like checking receipt status and viewing the message history. The SDK should allow configuration via a server URL and API key, and it must integrate with Firebase Messaging. Please provide methods for initializing the SDK, setting the device token, registering the device with a member number, and handling incoming notification clicks to open specific content.
kotlin android push-notification firebase fcm sdk android-development mobile
Generated by gemma4:latest
Catalog Information
Create an Android push notification SDK wrapper using Kotlin. I need functionality to handle device registration, manage FCM token setting, and support various push notification actions like checking receipt status and viewing the message history. The SDK should allow configuration via a server URL and API key, and it must integrate with Firebase Messaging. Please provide methods for initializing the SDK, setting the device token, registering the device with a member number, and handling incomin
Tags
kotlin android push-notification firebase fcm sdk android-development mobile
Quality Score
D
55.7/100
Structure
40
Code Quality
80
Documentation
59
Testing
0
Practices
72
Security
80
Dependencies
80
Strengths
- Consistent naming conventions (PascalCase)
- Low average code complexity — well-structured code
Weaknesses
- No LICENSE file — legal ambiguity for contributors
- No tests found — high risk of regressions
- No CI/CD configuration — manual testing and deployment
- Potential hardcoded secrets in 2 files
- 110 duplicate lines detected — consider DRY refactoring
Recommendations
- Add a test suite — start with critical path integration tests
- Set up CI/CD (GitHub Actions recommended) to automate testing and deployment
- Add a linter configuration to enforce code style consistency
- Add a LICENSE file (MIT recommended for open source)
- Move hardcoded secrets to environment variables or a secrets manager
Languages
Frameworks
None detected
Symbols
property110
method48
class26
constant26
function3
Embed Badge
Add to your README:
