2025 Software Issues

C 61 completed
Other
unknown / yaml · tiny
10
Files
814
LOC
0
Frameworks
2
Languages

Pipeline State

completed
Run ID
#392075
Phase
done
Progress
1%
Started
Finished
2026-04-13 01:31:02
LLM tokens
0

Pipeline Metadata

Stage
Skipped
Decision
skip_scaffold_dup
Novelty
16.18
Framework unique
Isolation
Last stage change
2026-04-16 18:15:42
Deduplication group #47464
Member of a group with 1 similar repo(s) — canonical #100872 view group →
Top concepts (1)
Project Description
Repobility · severity-and-effort ranking · https://repobility.com

AI Prompt

Create a project structure for logging software subsystem issues for the 2025-2026 design cycle. This repository should serve as a central place to track technical decisions and issues. I need to document three types of issues: Epics (goals lasting 1-2 months), Stories (individual features taking 1-2 weeks), and Tasks (small, few-hour tasks). Please ensure the README clearly states that this repository is not for code and that PRs should not be opened here. Also, include a section for logging major technical decisions, noting that these will also be documented in Google Docs.
documentation markdown yaml project-management issue-tracking design-cycle readme
Generated by gemma4:latest

Catalog Information

THIS REPOSITORY IS NOT FOR CODE. DO NOT OPEN PRS HERE

Description

THIS REPOSITORY IS NOT FOR CODE. DO NOT OPEN PRS HERE

Novelty

3/10

Tags

documentation markdown yaml project-management issue-tracking design-cycle readme

Claude Models

claude-opus-4-6

Quality Score

C
60.7/100
Structure
36
Code Quality
100
Documentation
30
Testing
15
Practices
78
Security
100
Dependencies
50

Strengths

  • CI/CD pipeline configured (github_actions)
  • Low average code complexity \u2014 well-structured code
  • Good security practices \u2014 no major issues detected

Weaknesses

  • No LICENSE file \u2014 legal ambiguity for contributors
  • No tests found \u2014 high risk of regressions

Recommendations

  • Add a test suite \u2014 start with critical path integration tests
  • Add a linter configuration to enforce code style consistency
  • Add a LICENSE file (MIT recommended for open source)

Security & Health

4.1h
Tech Debt (E)
A
OWASP (100%)
PASS
Quality Gate
A
Risk (10)
Same scanner, your repo: https://repobility.com — Repobility
Unknown
License
0.0%
Duplication
Full Security Report AI Fix Prompts SARIF SBOM

Languages

yaml
61.9%
markdown
38.1%

Frameworks

None detected

Concepts (1)

Source-of-truth: Repobility · https://repobility.com
CategoryNameDescriptionConfidence
Provenance: Repobility (https://repobility.com) — every score reproducible from /scan/
auto_descriptionProject DescriptionTHIS REPOSITORY IS NOT FOR CODE. DO NOT OPEN PRS HERE80%

Quality Timeline

1 quality score recorded.

View File Metrics

Embed Badge

Add to your README:

![Quality](https://repos.aljefra.com/badge/116408.svg)
Quality BadgeSecurity Badge
Export Quality CSVDownload SBOMExport Findings CSV