Ai Skills Collection

F 44 completed
Other
unknown / markdown · tiny
45
Files
7,259
LOC
1
Frameworks
8
Languages

Pipeline State

completed
Run ID
#394611
Phase
done
Progress
1%
Started
Finished
2026-04-13 01:31:02
LLM tokens
0

Pipeline Metadata

Stage
Skipped
Decision
skip_scaffold_dup
Novelty
36.93
Framework unique
Isolation
Last stage change
2026-04-16 18:15:42
Deduplication group #47735
Member of a group with 1 similar repo(s) — canonical #66457 view group →
Top concepts (1)
Testing
Open data scored by Repobility · https://repobility.com

AI Prompt

I need a guide or set of instructions for an AI coding assistant, specifically for Claude Code, on how to effectively work with the code within this repository. The repository contains various files like markdown, python, html, and typescript, and I want the guidance to cover best practices for reviewing and utilizing the existing structure, which seems to include agent-related directories. Please focus the instructions on how to approach the codebase given its mixed nature.
markdown python typescript ai-assistant guidance code-review documentation
Generated by gemma4:latest

Catalog Information

This file provides guidance to Claude Code (claude.ai/code) when working with code in this repository.

Description

This file provides guidance to Claude Code (claude.ai/code) when working with code in this repository.

Novelty

3/10

Tags

markdown python typescript ai-assistant guidance code-review documentation

Claude Models

claude-opus-4-6

Quality Score

F
44.4/100
Structure
41
Code Quality
71
Documentation
34
Testing
0
Practices
47
Security
62
Dependencies
60

Strengths

  • Code linting configured (ruff (possible))
  • Consistent naming conventions (snake_case)

Weaknesses

  • Missing README file \u2014 critical for project understanding
  • No LICENSE file \u2014 legal ambiguity for contributors
  • No tests found \u2014 high risk of regressions
  • No CI/CD configuration \u2014 manual testing and deployment
  • Potential hardcoded secrets in 3 files
  • 184 duplicate lines detected \u2014 consider DRY refactoring

Recommendations

  • Add a comprehensive README.md explaining purpose, setup, usage, and architecture
  • Add a test suite \u2014 start with critical path integration tests
  • Set up CI/CD (GitHub Actions recommended) to automate testing and deployment
  • Add a LICENSE file (MIT recommended for open source)
  • Move hardcoded secrets to environment variables or a secrets manager

Security & Health

5.6h
Tech Debt (B)
A
OWASP (100%)
FAIL
Quality Gate
A
Risk (14)
Repobility · open methodology · https://repobility.com/research/
Unknown
License
3.1%
Duplication
Full Security Report AI Fix Prompts SARIF SBOM

Languages

markdown
47.4%
python
30.6%
html
17.3%
text
2.3%
typescript
1.0%
shell
0.6%
json
0.4%
toml
0.2%

Frameworks

pytest

Concepts (1)

Per-row analysis by Repobility · https://repobility.com
CategoryNameDescriptionConfidence
Same scanner, your repo: https://repobility.com — Repobility
auto_categoryTestingtesting70%

Quality Timeline

1 quality score recorded.

View File Metrics

Embed Badge

Add to your README:

![Quality](https://repos.aljefra.com/badge/118960.svg)
Quality BadgeSecurity Badge
Export Quality CSVDownload SBOMExport Findings CSV