Patientpartner

D 55 completed
Other
unknown / python · small
61
Files
9,384
LOC
1
Frameworks
5
Languages

Pipeline State

completed
Run ID
#396197
Phase
done
Progress
1%
Started
Finished
2026-04-13 01:31:02
LLM tokens
0

Pipeline Metadata

Stage
Skipped
Decision
skip_scaffold_dup
Novelty
36.58
Framework unique
Isolation
Last stage change
2026-04-16 18:15:42
Deduplication group #47518
Member of a group with 1 similar repo(s) — canonical #113957 view group →
Top concepts (2)
Project DescriptionTesting
Repobility · code-quality intelligence platform · https://repobility.com

AI Prompt

Create a comprehensive simulation sandbox environment for a patient companion service, using Python. The system needs to simulate the entire operational flow based on real industry data. Key features to include are demand modeling (incorporating time slots, age stratification, and holiday effects), supply simulation (covering recruiter decay, training, and willingness to take orders), and a multi-level matching engine that considers geographic distance and time conflicts. It should also support advanced analytics like LTV/CAC calculation, break-even analysis, and Monte Carlo simulations to test various uncertain parameters like repurchase rates and complaint impact. Please structure the code using modules for demand, supply, matching, and analytics.
python simulation business-simulation analytics modeling healthcare pytest
Generated by gemma4:latest

Catalog Information

基于真实行业数据的陪诊业务沙箱模拟环境,用于 GMV 预测、运营决策支持和业务参数验证。

Description

基于真实行业数据的陪诊业务沙箱模拟环境,用于 GMV 预测、运营决策支持和业务参数验证。

Novelty

3/10

Tags

python simulation business-simulation analytics modeling healthcare pytest

Technologies

anthropic openai pydantic streamlit

Claude Models

claude-opus-4-6

Quality Score

D
55.1/100
Structure
48
Code Quality
65
Documentation
64
Testing
0
Practices
64
Security
100
Dependencies
60

Strengths

  • Consistent naming conventions (snake_case)
  • Good security practices \u2014 no major issues detected

Weaknesses

  • No LICENSE file \u2014 legal ambiguity for contributors
  • No tests found \u2014 high risk of regressions
  • No CI/CD configuration \u2014 manual testing and deployment
  • 536 duplicate lines detected \u2014 consider DRY refactoring
  • 1 'god files' with >500 LOC need decomposition

Recommendations

  • Add a test suite \u2014 start with critical path integration tests
  • Set up CI/CD (GitHub Actions recommended) to automate testing and deployment
  • Add a linter configuration to enforce code style consistency
  • Add a LICENSE file (MIT recommended for open source)

Security & Health

4.1h
Tech Debt (B)
A
OWASP (100%)
PASS
Quality Gate
A
Risk (1)
Repobility (the analyzer behind this table) · https://repobility.com
Unknown
License
10.5%
Duplication
Full Security Report AI Fix Prompts SARIF SBOM

Languages

python
80.0%
markdown
11.8%
yaml
6.6%
json
1.5%
text
0.1%

Frameworks

pytest

Concepts (2)

Source-of-truth: Repobility · https://repobility.com
CategoryNameDescriptionConfidence
Want fix-PRs on findings? Install Repobility's GitHub App · github.com/apps/repobility-bot
auto_descriptionProject Description基于真实行业数据的陪诊业务沙箱模拟环境,用于 GMV 预测、运营决策支持和业务参数验证。80%
auto_categoryTestingtesting70%

Quality Timeline

1 quality score recorded.

View File Metrics

Embed Badge

Add to your README:

![Quality](https://repos.aljefra.com/badge/120556.svg)
Quality BadgeSecurity Badge
Export Quality CSVDownload SBOMExport Findings CSV