Homebrew Tap
D 58 completed
Other
unknown / ruby · tiny
2
Files
56
LOC
0
Frameworks
2
Languages
Pipeline State
completedRun ID
#1528262Phase
doneProgress
0%Started
2026-04-16 14:35:31Finished
2026-04-16 14:35:31LLM tokens
0Pipeline Metadata
Stage
SkippedDecision
skip_tinyNovelty
14.12Framework unique
—Isolation
—Last stage change
2026-04-16 18:15:42Deduplication group #47697
Member of a group with 153 similar repo(s) — canonical #1450443 view group →
Repobility — the code-quality scanner for AI-generated software · https://repobility.com
🧪 Code Distillation
Browse all specs →AI Prompt
I want to create a Homebrew tap repository structure. The goal is to provide formulae for the AgentGuard tool. The repository should include a main README file explaining how to tap the repository and install the formulae. Specifically, I need to document the installation steps using `brew tap` and `brew install`, and list the available formulae, such as `agent-guard`, along with a description of what each formula does, like being a macOS menu bar security scanner for MCP servers and AI agent skills.
ruby homebrew macos devops command-line formulae scripting
Generated by gemma4:latest
Catalog Information
I want to create a Homebrew tap repository structure. The goal is to provide formulae for the AgentGuard tool. The repository should include a main README file explaining how to tap the repository and install the formulae. Specifically, I need to document the installation steps using brew tap and brew install, and list the available formulae, such as agent-guard, along with a description of what each formula does, like being a macOS menu bar security scanner for MCP servers and AI agent sk
Tags
ruby homebrew macos devops command-line formulae scripting
Quality Score
D
58.2/100
Structure
38
Code Quality
100
Documentation
36
Testing
0
Practices
74
Security
90
Dependencies
50
Strengths
- Consistent naming conventions (kebab-case)
- Low average code complexity — well-structured code
- Good security practices — no major issues detected
Weaknesses
- No LICENSE file — legal ambiguity for contributors
- No tests found — high risk of regressions
- No CI/CD configuration — manual testing and deployment
- Potential hardcoded secrets in 1 files
Recommendations
- Add a test suite — start with critical path integration tests
- Set up CI/CD (GitHub Actions recommended) to automate testing and deployment
- Add a linter configuration to enforce code style consistency
- Add a LICENSE file (MIT recommended for open source)
- Move hardcoded secrets to environment variables or a secrets manager
Languages
Frameworks
None detected
Symbols
method2
class1
function1
Embed Badge
Add to your README:
