Goal Oriented Development
D 58 completed
Other
unknown / markdown · tiny
16
Files
1,400
LOC
0
Frameworks
1
Languages
Pipeline State
completedRun ID
#1535874Phase
doneProgress
0%Started
2026-04-16 16:50:51Finished
2026-04-16 16:50:51LLM tokens
0Pipeline Metadata
Stage
SkippedDecision
skip_scaffold_dupNovelty
8.00Framework unique
—Isolation
—Last stage change
2026-04-16 18:15:42Deduplication group #47247
Member of a group with 11,584 similar repo(s) — canonical #1453550 view group →
About: code-quality intelligence by Repobility · https://repobility.com
AI Prompt
Create a meta framework for Goal Oriented Development, similar to the GOD concept described in the README. I need a system that orchestrates the entire task lifecycle, from requirement gathering to PR delivery. The core functionality should include steps like `install`, `init` (which can ingest Jira links or manual descriptions), `plan`, `implement`, and `pack-up`. Please ensure the system manages state in a `GOD/` folder, tracks status, and incorporates specialized sub-skills for review, status checking, and learning.
markdown meta-framework development-process workflow project-management cicd automation
Generated by gemma4:latest
Catalog Information
Create a meta framework for Goal Oriented Development, similar to the GOD concept described in the README. I need a system that orchestrates the entire task lifecycle, from requirement gathering to PR delivery. The core functionality should include steps like install, init (which can ingest Jira links or manual descriptions), plan, implement, and pack-up. Please ensure the system manages state in a GOD/ folder, tracks status, and incorporates specialized sub-skills for review, status
Tags
markdown meta-framework development-process workflow project-management cicd automation
Quality Score
D
57.6/100
Structure
32
Code Quality
100
Documentation
30
Testing
0
Practices
78
Security
100
Dependencies
50
Strengths
- Low average code complexity — well-structured code
- Good security practices — no major issues detected
Weaknesses
- No LICENSE file — legal ambiguity for contributors
- No tests found — high risk of regressions
- No CI/CD configuration — manual testing and deployment
Recommendations
- Add a test suite — start with critical path integration tests
- Set up CI/CD (GitHub Actions recommended) to automate testing and deployment
- Add a linter configuration to enforce code style consistency
- Add a LICENSE file (MIT recommended for open source)
Languages
Frameworks
None detected
Embed Badge
Add to your README:
