Grass Agreement

D 50 completed
Other
unknown / r · tiny
16
Files
1,564
LOC
0
Frameworks
2
Languages

Pipeline State

completed
Run ID
#1542037
Phase
done
Progress
0%
Started
2026-04-16 21:11:09
Finished
2026-04-16 21:11:09
LLM tokens
0

Pipeline Metadata

Stage
Cataloged
Decision
proceed
Novelty
14.41
Framework unique
Isolation
Last stage change
2026-05-10 03:34:29
Deduplication group #47862
Member of a group with 185 similar repo(s) — canonical #1559941 view group →
All rows scored by the Repobility analyzer (https://repobility.com)

AI Prompt

Create a basic R project structure for analyzing and summarizing a grass agreement. I need the setup to include a `config.yaml` file for settings, a directory for R scripts, and a place to store references using a BibTeX file. Also, please include a LaTeX file, `summary_writeup.tex`, to help generate a formal summary document, and ensure there's a `.gitignore` file in the root.
r yaml latex academic data-analysis scripting
Generated by gemma4:latest

Catalog Information

Create a basic R project structure for analyzing and summarizing a grass agreement. I need the setup to include a config.yaml file for settings, a directory for R scripts, and a place to store references using a BibTeX file. Also, please include a LaTeX file, summary_writeup.tex, to help generate a formal summary document, and ensure there's a .gitignore file in the root.

Tags

r yaml latex academic data-analysis scripting

Quality Score

D
50.2/100
Structure
34
Code Quality
73
Documentation
22
Testing
0
Practices
78
Security
100
Dependencies
50

Strengths

  • Consistent naming conventions (snake_case)
  • Good security practices — no major issues detected

Weaknesses

  • Missing README file — critical for project understanding
  • No LICENSE file — legal ambiguity for contributors
  • No tests found — high risk of regressions
  • No CI/CD configuration — manual testing and deployment

Recommendations

  • Add a comprehensive README.md explaining purpose, setup, usage, and architecture
  • Add a test suite — start with critical path integration tests
  • Set up CI/CD (GitHub Actions recommended) to automate testing and deployment
  • Add a linter configuration to enforce code style consistency
  • Add a LICENSE file (MIT recommended for open source)

Languages

r
96.8%
yaml
3.2%

Frameworks

None detected

Quality Timeline

1 quality score recorded.

View File Metrics

Embed Badge

Add to your README:

![Quality](https://repos.aljefra.com/badge/1365570.svg)
Quality BadgeSecurity Badge
Export Quality CSVDownload SBOMExport Findings CSV