Delimit Quickstart

C 62 completed
Other
api / yaml · tiny
8
Files
272
LOC
0
Frameworks
2
Languages

Pipeline State

completed
Run ID
#1542152
Phase
done
Progress
0%
Started
2026-04-16 21:16:37
Finished
2026-04-16 21:16:37
LLM tokens
0

Pipeline Metadata

Stage
Cataloged
Decision
proceed
Novelty
31.02
Framework unique
Isolation
Last stage change
2026-05-10 03:35:28
Deduplication group #49966
Member of a group with 15 similar repo(s) — canonical #189399 view group →
Provenance: Repobility (https://repobility.com) — every score reproducible from /scan/

AI Prompt

Create a project demonstrating API governance using OpenAPI specifications. I need to show how to detect and report breaking changes between two versions of an API spec, like comparing `openapi.yaml` to `openapi-changed.yaml`. The setup should include running governance checks via GitHub Actions, ideally showing a status report with multiple gates (like API Lint, Policy Compliance, etc.). Also, include instructions for setting up governance in a local project using a CLI tool, and mention the ability to use compliance templates like SOC2 or HIPAA.
yaml openapi api-governance github-actions ci-cd api-spec workflow devops
Generated by gemma4:latest

Catalog Information

Create a project demonstrating API governance using OpenAPI specifications. I need to show how to detect and report breaking changes between two versions of an API spec, like comparing openapi.yaml to openapi-changed.yaml. The setup should include running governance checks via GitHub Actions, ideally showing a status report with multiple gates (like API Lint, Policy Compliance, etc.). Also, include instructions for setting up governance in a local project using a CLI tool, and mention the ab

Tags

yaml openapi api-governance github-actions ci-cd api-spec workflow devops

Quality Score

C
62.0/100
Structure
43
Code Quality
100
Documentation
30
Testing
15
Practices
78
Security
100
Dependencies
50

Strengths

  • CI/CD pipeline configured (github_actions)
  • Low average code complexity — well-structured code
  • Good security practices — no major issues detected
  • Properly licensed project

Weaknesses

  • No tests found — high risk of regressions

Recommendations

  • Add a test suite — start with critical path integration tests
  • Add a linter configuration to enforce code style consistency

Languages

yaml
73.3%
markdown
26.7%

Frameworks

None detected

Quality Timeline

1 quality score recorded.

View File Metrics

Embed Badge

Add to your README:

![Quality](https://repos.aljefra.com/badge/1365712.svg)
Quality BadgeSecurity Badge
Export Quality CSVDownload SBOMExport Findings CSV