Macguffin

C+ 74 completed
Other
unknown / go · tiny
45
Files
3,847
LOC
0
Frameworks
4
Languages

Pipeline State

completed
Run ID
#1545953
Phase
done
Progress
0%
Started
2026-04-16 23:38:22
Finished
2026-04-16 23:38:22
LLM tokens
0

Pipeline Metadata

Stage
Cataloged
Decision
proceed
Novelty
20.86
Framework unique
Isolation
Last stage change
2026-05-10 03:35:28
Deduplication group #47297
Member of a group with 1,212 similar repo(s) — canonical #186444 view group →
Repobility (the analyzer behind this table) · https://repobility.com

AI Prompt

Create a command-line tool, similar to MacGuffin, that functions as an OS-level substrate for agentic workflows. The core concept is that the local filesystem should act as the primary database, avoiding traditional databases or servers. The tool needs commands to initialize a workspace (`mg init`), create new work items (`mg new`), list available work (`mg list`), and view a specific item (`mg show <id>`). It must also support a maildir-style messaging system (`mg mail send`) between agents, and optionally handle version control snapshots using Git (`mg snapshot`, `mg log`). The implementation should be in Go.
go cli filesystem agentic workflow command-line unix markdown shell
Generated by gemma4:latest

Catalog Information

Create a command-line tool, similar to MacGuffin, that functions as an OS-level substrate for agentic workflows. The core concept is that the local filesystem should act as the primary database, avoiding traditional databases or servers. The tool needs commands to initialize a workspace (mg init), create new work items (mg new), list available work (mg list), and view a specific item (mg show <id>). It must also support a maildir-style messaging system (mg mail send) between agents, an

Tags

go cli filesystem agentic workflow command-line unix markdown shell

Quality Score

C+
73.5/100
Structure
62
Code Quality
100
Documentation
39
Testing
55
Practices
80
Security
100
Dependencies
70

Strengths

  • CI/CD pipeline configured (github_actions)
  • Good test coverage (35% test-to-source ratio)
  • Consistent naming conventions (snake_case)
  • Good security practices — no major issues detected

Weaknesses

  • No LICENSE file — legal ambiguity for contributors
  • 127 duplicate lines detected — consider DRY refactoring

Recommendations

  • Add a test suite — start with critical path integration tests
  • Add a linter configuration to enforce code style consistency
  • Add a LICENSE file (MIT recommended for open source)

Languages

go
82.7%
markdown
11.8%
shell
3.0%
yaml
2.5%

Frameworks

None detected

Symbols

function37
struct3
variable3

Quality Timeline

1 quality score recorded.

View File Metrics

Embed Badge

Add to your README:

![Quality](https://repos.aljefra.com/badge/1369721.svg)
Quality BadgeSecurity Badge
Export Quality CSVDownload SBOMExport Findings CSV