Claude Skills

D 58 completed
Other
unknown / markdown · tiny
12
Files
638
LOC
0
Frameworks
1
Languages

Pipeline State

completed
Run ID
#1546297
Phase
done
Progress
0%
Started
2026-04-16 23:56:08
Finished
2026-04-16 23:56:08
LLM tokens
0

Pipeline Metadata

Stage
Cataloged
Decision
proceed
Novelty
17.46
Framework unique
Isolation
Last stage change
2026-05-10 03:26:32
Deduplication group #47247
Member of a group with 11,584 similar repo(s) — canonical #1453550 view group →
Methodology: Repobility · https://repobility.com/research/state-of-ai-code-2026/

AI Prompt

Create a comprehensive set of custom skills for an AI coding tool, specifically focused on scientific and technical writing for biotechnology R&D in industrial settings. The skills should cover every document type needed throughout the biotech research lifecycle, such as abstracts for various grants, government and commercial proposals (DARPA, DOE, BARDA), technical reports, literature reviews, white papers, statements of work, progress reports, patent disclosures, and presentations. Please ensure the core principles like "Data over claims," "Audience-calibrated framing," and "Precision of language" are incorporated into the structure.
markdown scientific-writing biotechnology technical-writing document-generation ai-skills research-and-development
Generated by gemma4:latest

Catalog Information

Create a comprehensive set of custom skills for an AI coding tool, specifically focused on scientific and technical writing for biotechnology R&D in industrial settings. The skills should cover every document type needed throughout the biotech research lifecycle, such as abstracts for various grants, government and commercial proposals (DARPA, DOE, BARDA), technical reports, literature reviews, white papers, statements of work, progress reports, patent disclosures, and presentations. Please ensu

Tags

markdown scientific-writing biotechnology technical-writing document-generation ai-skills research-and-development

Quality Score

D
57.6/100
Structure
32
Code Quality
100
Documentation
30
Testing
0
Practices
78
Security
100
Dependencies
50

Strengths

  • Low average code complexity — well-structured code
  • Good security practices — no major issues detected

Weaknesses

  • No LICENSE file — legal ambiguity for contributors
  • No tests found — high risk of regressions
  • No CI/CD configuration — manual testing and deployment

Recommendations

  • Add a test suite — start with critical path integration tests
  • Set up CI/CD (GitHub Actions recommended) to automate testing and deployment
  • Add a linter configuration to enforce code style consistency
  • Add a LICENSE file (MIT recommended for open source)

Languages

markdown
100.0%

Frameworks

None detected

Quality Timeline

1 quality score recorded.

View File Metrics

Embed Badge

Add to your README:

![Quality](https://repos.aljefra.com/badge/1370074.svg)
Quality BadgeSecurity Badge
Export Quality CSVDownload SBOMExport Findings CSV