.Dotfiles

C 62 failed
Library
unknown / xml · small
82
Files
6,253
LOC
0
Frameworks
8
Languages

Pipeline State

completed
Run ID
#407168
Phase
done
Progress
1%
Started
Finished
2026-04-13 01:31:02
LLM tokens
0
Previous runs
Same analyzer free for public repos: https://repobility.com
#StatusPhaseStartedFinished
Repobility — same analyzer, your code, free for public repos · /scan/
#186252failedAI_REASONING2026-04-10 18:17:03

Pipeline Metadata

Stage
Skipped
Decision
skip_scaffold_dup
Novelty
26.44
Framework unique
Isolation
Last stage change
2026-04-16 18:15:42
Deduplication group #47499
Member of a group with 156 similar repo(s) — canonical #1582697 view group →
Top concepts (4)
RepositoryAuthenticationConfigurationFile Management
Repobility — same analyzer, your code, free for public repos · /scan/

AI Prompt

Create a set of personal dotfiles repository that manages various configuration files for different tools. The setup should be designed to be managed using GNU Stow. Include instructions for bootstrapping using Homebrew and a `brew bundle` command. The repository should contain specific directories for tools like `nvim`, `zsh`, `tmux`, and `starship`. It should also manage configurations for AI agents in a dedicated `agents` directory and provide clear usage instructions for applying, testing, and unstowing packages.
dotfiles shell configuration bash stow linux unix cli setup
Generated by gemma4:latest

Catalog Information

Create a set of personal dotfiles repository that manages various configuration files for different tools. The setup should be designed to be managed using GNU Stow. Include instructions for bootstrapping using Homebrew and a brew bundle command. The repository should contain specific directories for tools like nvim, zsh, tmux, and starship. It should also manage configurations for AI agents in a dedicated agents directory and provide clear usage instructions for applying, testing, a

Tags

dotfiles shell configuration bash stow linux unix cli setup

Quality Score

C
61.8/100
Structure
41
Code Quality
99
Documentation
55
Testing
0
Practices
75
Security
92
Dependencies
50

Strengths

  • Low average code complexity — well-structured code
  • Good security practices — no major issues detected

Weaknesses

  • No LICENSE file — legal ambiguity for contributors
  • No tests found — high risk of regressions
  • No CI/CD configuration — manual testing and deployment

Recommendations

  • Add a test suite — start with critical path integration tests
  • Set up CI/CD (GitHub Actions recommended) to automate testing and deployment
  • Add a linter configuration to enforce code style consistency
  • Add a LICENSE file (MIT recommended for open source)

Security & Health

9.8h
Tech Debt (C)
High
DORA Rating
A
OWASP (90%)
PASS
Quality Gate
About: code-quality intelligence by Repobility · https://repobility.com
12.1%
Duplication
Full Security Report AI Fix Prompts SARIF SBOM

Languages

xml
37.3%
markdown
37.1%
lua
12.5%
toml
6.5%
text
3.0%
shell
1.7%
json
1.7%
yaml
0.1%

Frameworks

None detected

Concepts (4)

Repobility · code-quality intelligence · https://repobility.com
CategoryNameDescriptionConfidence
Powered by Repobility — scan your code at https://repobility.com
design_patternRepositoryFound repository-named files80%
business_logicAuthenticationDetected from 3 related files50%
business_logicConfigurationDetected from 44 related files50%
business_logicFile ManagementDetected from 4 related files50%

Quality Timeline

1 quality score recorded.

View File Metrics

Embed Badge

Add to your README:

![Quality](https://repos.aljefra.com/badge/184743.svg)
Quality BadgeSecurity Badge
Export Quality CSVDownload SBOMExport Findings CSV