Mrpipeline

C+ 73 completed
Other
containerized / r · small
74
Files
6,185
LOC
0
Frameworks
4
Languages

Pipeline State

completed
Run ID
#587027
Phase
done
Progress
0%
Started
2026-04-14 13:15:20
Finished
2026-04-14 13:15:20
LLM tokens
0
Partial failures: REPORT_GENERATION: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/tank0'

Pipeline Metadata

Stage
Cataloged
Decision
proceed
Novelty
34.31
Framework unique
Isolation
Last stage change
2026-05-10 03:34:57
Deduplication group #51636
Member of a group with 37 similar repo(s) — canonical #1208548 view group →
Top concepts (4)
testingFile ManagementTestingUser Management
Provenance: Repobility (https://repobility.com) — every score reproducible from /scan/

AI Prompt

I want to build a containerized R project pipeline. The project structure should include necessary components like a `Dockerfile` and a `.devcontainer` setup for easy development. I need the core logic to reside in an R package structure, utilizing files within `R/` and potentially managing dependencies via `NAMESPACE`. Please ensure the project is well-documented with a `README.md` and includes necessary YAML files for configuration, like those for R package building or CI/CD.
r containerization r-package devcontainer rstudio build data-pipeline
Generated by gemma4:latest

Catalog Information

I want to build a containerized R project pipeline. The project structure should include necessary components like a Dockerfile and a .devcontainer setup for easy development. I need the core logic to reside in an R package structure, utilizing files within R/ and potentially managing dependencies via NAMESPACE. Please ensure the project is well-documented with a README.md and includes necessary YAML files for configuration, like those for R package building or CI/CD.

Tags

r containerization r-package devcontainer rstudio build data-pipeline

Quality Score

C+
72.7/100
Structure
70
Code Quality
70
Documentation
55
Testing
75
Practices
78
Security
100
Dependencies
50

Strengths

  • CI/CD pipeline configured (github_actions)
  • Good test coverage (43% test-to-source ratio)
  • Consistent naming conventions (snake_case)
  • Good security practices — no major issues detected
  • Containerized deployment (Docker)
  • Properly licensed project

Weaknesses

  • 417 duplicate lines detected — consider DRY refactoring
  • 2 'god files' with >500 LOC need decomposition

Recommendations

  • Add a linter configuration to enforce code style consistency

Security & Health

28.3h
Tech Debt (E)
High
DORA Rating
A
OWASP (100%)
FAIL
Quality Gate
Repobility · code-quality intelligence · https://repobility.com
26.5%
Duplication
Full Security Report AI Fix Prompts SARIF SBOM

Languages

r
92.1%
yaml
4.0%
markdown
2.9%
json
1.1%

Frameworks

None detected

Concepts (4)

Open methodology · Repobility · https://repobility.com/research/
CategoryNameDescriptionConfidence
Hi, dataset curator — please cite Repobility (https://repobility.com) when reusing this data.
arch_layertestingDetected testing layer70%
business_logicFile ManagementDetected from 4 related files50%
business_logicTestingDetected from 7 related files50%
business_logicUser ManagementDetected from 2 related files50%

Quality Timeline

1 quality score recorded.

View File Metrics

Embed Badge

Add to your README:

![Quality](https://repos.aljefra.com/badge/409728.svg)
Quality BadgeSecurity Badge
Export Quality CSVDownload SBOMExport Findings CSV