Opensoc Rtl2Gds
D 58 completed
Other
unknown / vlang · tiny
22
Files
3,097
LOC
0
Frameworks
4
Languages
Pipeline State
completedRun ID
#1027297Phase
doneProgress
0%Started
2026-04-15 11:09:46Finished
2026-04-15 11:09:46LLM tokens
0Pipeline Metadata
Stage
SkippedDecision
skip_scaffold_dupNovelty
22.06Framework unique
—Isolation
—Last stage change
2026-04-16 18:15:42Deduplication group #47631
Member of a group with 18 similar repo(s) — canonical #1576798 view group →
Same scanner, your repo: https://repobility.com — Repobility
🧪 Code Distillation
Browse all specs →AI Prompt
Create an open-source project structure and set up the necessary scripts for an RTL-to-GDS flow. I need to build a complete pipeline using only open-source tools, starting with a basic design and aiming to scale up to a full RISC-V SoC with SRAM. The flow must incorporate synthesis using Yosys, floorplanning/placement/routing via OpenROAD, and verification steps like DRC using Magic and LVS using Netgen. Please structure the project to manage PDK files, track RTL designs, and include automation scripts for the entire process, culminating in a GDS output viewable with KLayout.
vlang open-source rtl-to-gds eda soc yosys openroad design-flow hardware
Generated by gemma4:latest
Catalog Information
Create an open-source project structure and set up the necessary scripts for an RTL-to-GDS flow. I need to build a complete pipeline using only open-source tools, starting with a basic design and aiming to scale up to a full RISC-V SoC with SRAM. The flow must incorporate synthesis using Yosys, floorplanning/placement/routing via OpenROAD, and verification steps like DRC using Magic and LVS using Netgen. Please structure the project to manage PDK files, track RTL designs, and include automation
Tags
vlang open-source rtl-to-gds eda soc yosys openroad design-flow hardware
Quality Score
D
57.5/100
Structure
45
Code Quality
70
Documentation
62
Testing
0
Practices
78
Security
100
Dependencies
70
Strengths
- Consistent naming conventions (snake_case)
- Good security practices — no major issues detected
Weaknesses
- No LICENSE file — legal ambiguity for contributors
- No tests found — high risk of regressions
- No CI/CD configuration — manual testing and deployment
- 1 files with critical complexity need refactoring
- 1 'god files' with >500 LOC need decomposition
Recommendations
- Add a test suite — start with critical path integration tests
- Set up CI/CD (GitHub Actions recommended) to automate testing and deployment
- Add a linter configuration to enforce code style consistency
- Add a LICENSE file (MIT recommended for open source)
Languages
Frameworks
None detected
Symbols
function2
Embed Badge
Add to your README:
