Umedcta Formalization
C 64 completed
Other
unknown / perl · small
184
Files
29,077
LOC
0
Frameworks
8
Languages
Pipeline State
completedRun ID
#1059364Phase
doneProgress
0%Started
2026-04-15 12:26:17Finished
2026-04-15 12:26:17LLM tokens
0Pipeline Metadata
Stage
SkippedDecision
skip_scaffold_dupNovelty
35.00Framework unique
—Isolation
—Last stage change
2026-04-16 18:15:42Deduplication group #50982
Member of a group with 24 similar repo(s) — canonical #484751 view group →
Methodology: Repobility · https://repobility.com/research/state-of-ai-code-2026/
🧪 Code Distillation
Browse all specs →AI Prompt
I want to build a project structure for formalization, perhaps related to logic or knowledge representation. The repository seems to contain various files like markdown, html, and javascript alongside directories for 'prolog' and 'more-zeeman'. Could you set up a basic scaffolding that includes a README, a design directory, and perhaps a sample file structure demonstrating how to integrate Prolog logic with some basic HTML/JavaScript frontend elements?
perl prolog formalization logic scaffolding html javascript design
Generated by gemma4:latest
Catalog Information
I want to build a project structure for formalization, perhaps related to logic or knowledge representation. The repository seems to contain various files like markdown, html, and javascript alongside directories for 'prolog' and 'more-zeeman'. Could you set up a basic scaffolding that includes a README, a design directory, and perhaps a sample file structure demonstrating how to integrate Prolog logic with some basic HTML/JavaScript frontend elements?
Tags
perl prolog formalization logic scaffolding html javascript design
Quality Score
C
63.8/100
Structure
48
Code Quality
84
Documentation
35
Testing
60
Practices
65
Security
92
Dependencies
70
Strengths
- Good test coverage (44% test-to-source ratio)
- Consistent naming conventions (snake_case)
- Good security practices — no major issues detected
Weaknesses
- Missing README file — critical for project understanding
- No LICENSE file — legal ambiguity for contributors
- No CI/CD configuration — manual testing and deployment
- 409 duplicate lines detected — consider DRY refactoring
- 4 'god files' with >500 LOC need decomposition
Recommendations
- Add a comprehensive README.md explaining purpose, setup, usage, and architecture
- Set up CI/CD (GitHub Actions recommended) to automate testing and deployment
- Add a linter configuration to enforce code style consistency
- Add a LICENSE file (MIT recommended for open source)
Languages
Frameworks
None detected
Symbols
method49
variable40
function12
constant9
class8
Embed Badge
Add to your README:
Source: Repobility analyzer · https://repobility.com
BinComp Dependency Hardening
All packages →2 of this repo's dependencies have been scanned for binary hardening. Grade reflects RELRO / stack canary / FORTIFY / PIE coverage.