Api

C 66 completed
Other
unknown / protobuf · tiny
34
Files
1,992
LOC
0
Frameworks
3
Languages

Pipeline State

completed
Run ID
#1119555
Phase
done
Progress
0%
Started
2026-04-15 14:54:08
Finished
2026-04-15 14:54:08
LLM tokens
0

Pipeline Metadata

Stage
Cataloged
Decision
proceed
Novelty
42.64
Framework unique
Isolation
Last stage change
2026-05-10 03:26:32
Deduplication group #52634
Member of a group with 19 similar repo(s) — canonical #1520622 view group →
Same scanner, your repo: https://repobility.com — Repobility

AI Prompt

Create a project structure that defines the API contracts for the AgentCrate platform using Protocol Buffers. I need to define several services, including `AgentRegistryService`, `McpRegistryService`, `ModelRegistryService`, `AuthService`, `AdminService`, and `NotificationService`. The definitions should be structured within `proto/agentcrate/v1/` and should support gRPC, gRPC-Web, and Connect protocols. Please ensure the setup includes necessary files like `buf.yaml` and documentation on how to generate client stubs for consumers like a Go CLI.
protobuf grpc api protocol-buffers agent-platform schema-definition connectrpc backend
Generated by gemma4:latest

Catalog Information

Create a project structure that defines the API contracts for the AgentCrate platform using Protocol Buffers. I need to define several services, including AgentRegistryService, McpRegistryService, ModelRegistryService, AuthService, AdminService, and NotificationService. The definitions should be structured within proto/agentcrate/v1/ and should support gRPC, gRPC-Web, and Connect protocols. Please ensure the setup includes necessary files like buf.yaml and documentation on how to

Tags

protobuf grpc api protocol-buffers agent-platform schema-definition connectrpc backend

Quality Score

C
66.3/100
Structure
57
Code Quality
100
Documentation
40
Testing
15
Practices
78
Security
100
Dependencies
50

Strengths

  • CI/CD pipeline configured (github_actions)
  • Low average code complexity — well-structured code
  • Good security practices — no major issues detected
  • Properly licensed project

Weaknesses

  • No tests found — high risk of regressions

Recommendations

  • Add a test suite — start with critical path integration tests
  • Add a linter configuration to enforce code style consistency

Languages

protobuf
73.3%
markdown
14.8%
yaml
11.8%

Frameworks

None detected

Quality Timeline

1 quality score recorded.

View File Metrics

Embed Badge

Add to your README:

![Quality](https://repos.aljefra.com/badge/763187.svg)
Quality BadgeSecurity Badge
Export Quality CSVDownload SBOMExport Findings CSV