Runlang
C 61 completed
Cli Tool
unknown / zig · tiny
49
Files
2,867
LOC
0
Frameworks
3
Languages
Pipeline State
completedRun ID
#358138Phase
doneProgress
1%Started
Finished
2026-04-13 01:31:02LLM tokens
0Pipeline Metadata
Stage
CatalogedDecision
proceedNovelty
41.20Framework unique
—Isolation
—Last stage change
2026-05-10 03:35:38Deduplication group #49905
Member of a group with 7 similar repo(s) — canonical #24172 view group →
Top concepts (1)
Documentation
Repobility · open methodology · https://repobility.com/research/
AI Prompt
I want to build a tool, similar to the Marsolab Runlang project, that allows users to execute Zig code. Could you set up the basic structure for this? I need it to handle the compilation and running of Zig code, and I'd like to include example usage in the `examples/` directory. Please ensure the project structure is set up correctly, including necessary build files like `build.zig` and documentation files like `SPEC.md`.
zig compiler tooling build-system code-execution
Generated by gemma4:latest
Catalog Information
The Marsolab Runlang project is a tool for running Zig code.
Description
Runlang is a utility that allows users to execute Zig code. It provides a way to compile and run Zig programs without requiring additional setup or configuration. The project's primary function is to facilitate the execution of Zig-based applications.
الوصف
هذا المشروع هو أداة تسمح للمستخدمين بتنفيذ التعليمات البرمجية المكتوبة بلغة زيغ. يتيح هذا الأداة تنفيذ برامج زيغ دون الحاجة إلى إعدادات أو تركيبات إضافية. وظيفته الرئيسية هي تسهيل تنفيذ التطبيقات التي تستند إلى لغة زيغ.
Novelty
3/10Tags
code-execution zig-language utility development-tool
Quality Score
C
61.1/100
Structure
61
Code Quality
52
Documentation
64
Testing
30
Practices
78
Security
100
Dependencies
50
Strengths
- Consistent naming conventions (snake_case)
- Good security practices \u2014 no major issues detected
- Properly licensed project
Weaknesses
- No CI/CD configuration \u2014 manual testing and deployment
- 612 duplicate lines detected \u2014 consider DRY refactoring
- 1 'god files' with >500 LOC need decomposition
Recommendations
- Add a test suite \u2014 start with critical path integration tests
- Set up CI/CD (GitHub Actions recommended) to automate testing and deployment
- Add a linter configuration to enforce code style consistency
Security & Health
4.6h
Tech Debt (C)
A
OWASP (100%)
PASS
Quality Gate
A
Risk (4)
Open data scored by Repobility · https://repobility.com
MIT
License
6.5%
Duplication
Languages
Frameworks
None detected
Concepts (1)
| Category | Name | Description | Confidence | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Repobility · severity-and-effort ranking · https://repobility.com | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| auto_category | Documentation | docs | 70% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Embed Badge
Add to your README:
