Validador Documentos

D 58 completed
Cli Tool
unknown / python · tiny
9
Files
1,064
LOC
1
Frameworks
4
Languages

Pipeline State

completed
Run ID
#361234
Phase
done
Progress
1%
Started
Finished
2026-04-13 01:31:02
LLM tokens
0

Pipeline Metadata

Stage
Cataloged
Decision
proceed
Novelty
42.35
Framework unique
Isolation
Last stage change
2026-05-10 03:35:24
Deduplication group #48140
Member of a group with 14 similar repo(s) — canonical #94925 view group →
Top concepts (1)
Web Backend
Generated by Repobility's multi-pass static-analysis pipeline (https://repobility.com)

AI Prompt

Create a document validation tool using Python and FastAPI. The goal is to build a system that can validate various types of documents. I need the core logic implemented in `main.py` and supporting utility functions in the `utils/` directory. The tool should handle input that might be provided as plain text, HTML, or Markdown, and the validation process should be clearly documented in the README.md.
python fastapi document-validation backend text html markdown
Generated by gemma4:latest

Catalog Information

The mirrorboy-creator project is a tool for validating documents.

Description

This project provides a document validation feature. It's designed to ensure the accuracy and completeness of documents. The tool can be used in various contexts, such as data processing or quality control. Its primary function is to verify the integrity of documents.

الوصف

هذا المشروع يقدم خاصية التحقق من صحة الوثائق. مصمم لضمان دقة وكمال الوثائق. يمكن استخدام هذا الأداة في العديد من السياقات، مثل معالجة البيانات أو ضبط جودة. وظيفته الرئيسية هي التحقق من سلامة الوثائق.

Novelty

3/10

Tags

document-validation data-processing quality-control document-integrity accuracy-checking

Technologies

anthropic fastapi uvicorn

Quality Score

D
57.5/100
Structure
42
Code Quality
80
Documentation
51
Testing
0
Practices
76
Security
100
Dependencies
60

Strengths

  • Consistent naming conventions (snake_case)
  • Good security practices \u2014 no major issues detected

Weaknesses

  • No LICENSE file \u2014 legal ambiguity for contributors
  • No tests found \u2014 high risk of regressions
  • No CI/CD configuration \u2014 manual testing and deployment

Recommendations

  • Add a test suite \u2014 start with critical path integration tests
  • Set up CI/CD (GitHub Actions recommended) to automate testing and deployment
  • Add a linter configuration to enforce code style consistency
  • Add a LICENSE file (MIT recommended for open source)

Security & Health

4.1h
Tech Debt (D)
A
OWASP (100%)
PASS
Quality Gate
A
Risk (9)
Repobility · open methodology · https://repobility.com/research/
Unknown
License
0.0%
Duplication
Full Security Report AI Fix Prompts SARIF SBOM

Languages

python
55.7%
html
43.4%
text
0.9%
markdown
0.0%

Frameworks

FastAPI

Concepts (1)

Data scored by Repobility · https://repobility.com
CategoryNameDescriptionConfidence
Want fix-PRs on findings? Install Repobility's GitHub App · github.com/apps/repobility-bot
auto_categoryWeb Backendweb-backend70%

Quality Timeline

1 quality score recorded.

View File Metrics

Embed Badge

Add to your README:

![Quality](https://repos.aljefra.com/badge/85387.svg)
Quality BadgeSecurity Badge
Export Quality CSVDownload SBOMExport Findings CSV