Iris

F 40 completed
Other
unknown / nim · tiny
30
Files
4,360
LOC
0
Frameworks
2
Languages

Pipeline State

completed
Run ID
#1249508
Phase
done
Progress
0%
Started
2026-04-15 19:58:14
Finished
2026-04-15 19:58:14
LLM tokens
0
Partial failures: REPORT_GENERATION: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/tank0'

Pipeline Metadata

Stage
Skipped
Decision
skip_scaffold_dup
Novelty
24.43
Framework unique
Isolation
Last stage change
2026-04-16 18:15:42
Deduplication group #48847
Member of a group with 13 similar repo(s) — canonical #1441566 view group →
Top concepts (1)
infrastructure
About: code-quality intelligence by Repobility · https://repobility.com

AI Prompt

I want to start a new project using Nim. Can you help me set up the basic structure for a small application? I see there are some example directories and specification files, so perhaps you can scaffold a basic project layout including a `src` directory, a `ROADMAP.md`, and a `SPEC.md`. The goal is just to get the foundational structure in place so I can start developing.
nim programming scaffolding project-setup documentation
Generated by gemma4:latest

Catalog Information

I want to start a new project using Nim. Can you help me set up the basic structure for a small application? I see there are some example directories and specification files, so perhaps you can scaffold a basic project layout including a src directory, a ROADMAP.md, and a SPEC.md. The goal is just to get the foundational structure in place so I can start developing.

Tags

nim programming scaffolding project-setup documentation

Quality Score

F
40.0/100
Structure
35
Code Quality
42
Documentation
6
Testing
0
Practices
78
Security
100
Dependencies
60

Strengths

  • Consistent naming conventions (snake_case)
  • Good security practices — no major issues detected

Weaknesses

  • Missing README file — critical for project understanding
  • No LICENSE file — legal ambiguity for contributors
  • No tests found — high risk of regressions
  • No CI/CD configuration — manual testing and deployment
  • 1 files with critical complexity need refactoring
  • 485 duplicate lines detected — consider DRY refactoring
  • 2 'god files' with >500 LOC need decomposition

Recommendations

  • Add a comprehensive README.md explaining purpose, setup, usage, and architecture
  • Add a test suite — start with critical path integration tests
  • Set up CI/CD (GitHub Actions recommended) to automate testing and deployment
  • Add a linter configuration to enforce code style consistency
  • Add a LICENSE file (MIT recommended for open source)

Security & Health

45.1h
Tech Debt (E)
A
OWASP (100%)
FAIL
Quality Gate
7.9%
Duplication
Full Security Report AI Fix Prompts SARIF SBOM
Repobility (the analyzer behind this table) · https://repobility.com

Languages

nim
69.9%
markdown
30.1%

Frameworks

None detected

Concepts (1)

Data scored by Repobility · https://repobility.com
CategoryNameDescriptionConfidence
Repobility · severity-and-effort ranking · https://repobility.com
arch_layerinfrastructureDetected infrastructure layer70%

Quality Timeline

1 quality score recorded.

View File Metrics

Embed Badge

Add to your README:

![Quality](https://repos.aljefra.com/badge/858850.svg)
Quality BadgeSecurity Badge
Export Quality CSVDownload SBOMExport Findings CSV