Perch

F 42 completed
Mobile App
unknown / swift · tiny
23
Files
3,144
LOC
0
Frameworks
3
Languages

Pipeline State

completed
Run ID
#370290
Phase
done
Progress
1%
Started
Finished
2026-04-13 01:31:02
LLM tokens
0

Pipeline Metadata

Stage
Skipped
Decision
skip_scaffold_dup
Novelty
20.48
Framework unique
Isolation
Last stage change
2026-04-16 18:15:42
Deduplication group #47686
Member of a group with 2 similar repo(s) — canonical #71788 view group →
Top concepts (1)
Data/ML
Repobility — same analyzer, your code, free for public repos · /scan/

AI Prompt

I want to build a mobile application for iOS using Swift. This project, called Perch, seems to be a general utility app, and I'm looking to get started with the basic structure. Can you help set up the initial scaffolding for an iOS app in Swift? I also see that the project uses JSON and Markdown files, so please ensure the structure is ready to handle reading and parsing these file types within the application logic.
swift ios mobile apple app
Generated by gemma4:latest

Catalog Information

The Perch project is a mobile application for iOS devices.

Description

This project appears to be a mobile app built using Swift, but its purpose and functionality are unclear due to the lack of documentation. It may provide some features or services, but without further information, it's difficult to determine what they are.

الوصف

هذا المشروع يبدو أنه تطبيق محمول بني باستخدام لغة Swift، لكن الغرض والوظيفة منه غير واضحة بسبب عدم توفر أي وصف أو معلومات. قد يقدم بعض الميزات أو الخدمات، ولكن دون مزيد من المعلومات، صعب تحديد ما هي.

Novelty

1/10

Tags

ios swift mobile-application

Claude Models

claude-opus-4.6

Quality Score

F
42.2/100
Structure
30
Code Quality
49
Documentation
15
Testing
0
Practices
78
Security
100
Dependencies
60

Strengths

  • Consistent naming conventions (PascalCase)
  • Good security practices \u2014 no major issues detected

Weaknesses

  • Missing README file \u2014 critical for project understanding
  • No LICENSE file \u2014 legal ambiguity for contributors
  • No tests found \u2014 high risk of regressions
  • No CI/CD configuration \u2014 manual testing and deployment
  • 419 duplicate lines detected \u2014 consider DRY refactoring

Recommendations

  • Add a comprehensive README.md explaining purpose, setup, usage, and architecture
  • Add a test suite \u2014 start with critical path integration tests
  • Set up CI/CD (GitHub Actions recommended) to automate testing and deployment
  • Add a linter configuration to enforce code style consistency
  • Add a LICENSE file (MIT recommended for open source)

Security & Health

6.6h
Tech Debt (D)
A
OWASP (100%)
FAIL
Quality Gate
A
Risk (17)
Provenance: Repobility (https://repobility.com) — every score reproducible from /scan/
Unknown
License
59.2%
Duplication
Full Security Report AI Fix Prompts SARIF SBOM

Languages

swift
93.9%
json
3.2%
markdown
2.9%

Frameworks

None detected

Concepts (1)

Source: Repobility analyzer (https://repobility.com)
CategoryNameDescriptionConfidence
Repobility · MCP-ready · https://repobility.com
auto_categoryData/MLdata-ml70%

Quality Timeline

1 quality score recorded.

View File Metrics

Embed Badge

Add to your README:

![Quality](https://repos.aljefra.com/badge/94495.svg)
Quality BadgeSecurity Badge
Export Quality CSVDownload SBOMExport Findings CSV