Review Reports
D 51 completed
Data Tool
unknown / html · tiny
9
Files
4,733
LOC
0
Frameworks
1
Languages
Pipeline State
completedRun ID
#371473Phase
doneProgress
1%Started
Finished
2026-04-13 01:31:02LLM tokens
0Pipeline Metadata
Stage
SkippedDecision
skip_scaffold_dupNovelty
39.46Framework unique
—Isolation
—Last stage change
2026-04-16 18:15:42Deduplication group #48818
Member of a group with 1 similar repo(s) — canonical #28070 view group →
Top concepts (1)
Web Frontend
Same scanner, your repo: https://repobility.com — Repobility
AI Prompt
Create a simple static website that generates various review reports. I need several HTML pages to display different types of reports, such as "approbation" and "rapport-reputation" for specific locations like "cafe-restaurant-la-scene" and "fasthotel-avignon-nord." The site should include pages for different reviews, like the "autopilot" contract review and a pitch script review. Please structure the necessary HTML files to showcase these different report templates.
html static-site report-generator html-templates web-development
Generated by gemma4:latest
Catalog Information
This project generates review reports for users.
Description
Review Reports is a tool that aggregates and presents user reviews in a structured format. It aims to provide a clear overview of the pros and cons of a product or service, helping users make informed decisions. The tool can be used by anyone looking to gather feedback from customers or users.
الوصف
هذا المشروع يقوم بجمع وتقديم تقارير المراجعات للمستخدمين في شكل ترتيبي واضح. يهدف إلى توفير نظرة عامة واضحة عن مزايا وعيوب المنتج أو الخدمة، مما يساعد المستخدم على اتخاذ قرارات مدروسة. يمكن استخدام هذا الأداة من قبل أي شخص يريد جمع آراء العملاء أو المستخدمين.
Novelty
3/10Tags
review-aggregation product-feedback customer-insights decision-support feedback-analysis
Claude Models
claude-opus-4.6
Quality Score
D
50.9/100
Structure
21
Code Quality
100
Documentation
0
Testing
0
Practices
78
Security
100
Dependencies
50
Strengths
- Low average code complexity \u2014 well-structured code
- Good security practices \u2014 no major issues detected
Weaknesses
- Missing README file \u2014 critical for project understanding
- No LICENSE file \u2014 legal ambiguity for contributors
- No tests found \u2014 high risk of regressions
- No CI/CD configuration \u2014 manual testing and deployment
Recommendations
- Add a comprehensive README.md explaining purpose, setup, usage, and architecture
- Add a test suite \u2014 start with critical path integration tests
- Set up CI/CD (GitHub Actions recommended) to automate testing and deployment
- Add a linter configuration to enforce code style consistency
- Add a LICENSE file (MIT recommended for open source)
Security & Health
4.1h
Tech Debt (C)
A
OWASP (100%)
PASS
Quality Gate
A
Risk (2)
Repobility · code-quality intelligence · https://repobility.com
Unknown
License
0.0%
Duplication
Languages
Frameworks
None detected
Concepts (1)
| Category | Name | Description | Confidence | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Repobility — same analyzer, your code, free for public repos · /scan/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| auto_category | Web Frontend | web-frontend | 70% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Embed Badge
Add to your README:
