Rivalry Rumble O Tron
C+ 76 completed
Cli Tool
unknown / python · small
52
Files
4,567
LOC
1
Frameworks
5
Languages
Pipeline State
completedRun ID
#372863Phase
doneProgress
1%Started
Finished
2026-04-13 01:31:02LLM tokens
0Pipeline Metadata
Stage
SkippedDecision
skip_scaffold_dupNovelty
41.81Framework unique
—Isolation
—Last stage change
2026-04-16 18:15:42Deduplication group #48057
Member of a group with 1 similar repo(s) — canonical #6835 view group →
Top concepts (1)
Testing
Source: Repobility analyzer · https://repobility.com
AI Prompt
I want to build a competitive activity tool, perhaps for a hackathon setting. The project should be structured to support various competitive engagements. Since the repository uses Python and includes pytest, please set up a basic structure that allows for defining and running different types of competitive challenges or "rumbles." The goal is to create a framework where users can engage in structured, competitive activities, and I'd like to ensure the testing framework is robust using pytest.
python pytest tool competitive framework hackathon activity
Generated by gemma4:latest
Catalog Information
The rivalry-rumble-o-tron project is a tool for users to engage in competitive activities.
Description
This project appears to be a simple application or script written in Python, but its purpose and functionality are unclear due to the lack of documentation. It may serve as a starting point or a basic implementation for more complex tasks.
الوصف
هذا المشروع يبدو أنه تطبيق بسيط أو سكريبت مكتوب بلغة بايثون، لكن أغراضه ووظائفه غير واضحة بسبب عدم توفر dokumentation. قد يكون يستخدم كقاعدة بداية أو تنفيذ أساسي لأعمال أكثر تعقيدا.
Novelty
3/10Tags
competitive-activities engagement-tool interactive-app
Claude Models
claude-opus-4.6
Quality Score
C+
76.4/100
Structure
65
Code Quality
90
Documentation
35
Testing
85
Practices
86
Security
100
Dependencies
60
Strengths
- CI/CD pipeline configured (github_actions)
- Good test coverage (65% test-to-source ratio)
- Code linting configured (ruff (possible))
- Consistent naming conventions (snake_case)
- Good security practices \u2014 no major issues detected
Weaknesses
- Missing README file \u2014 critical for project understanding
- No LICENSE file \u2014 legal ambiguity for contributors
- 137 duplicate lines detected \u2014 consider DRY refactoring
Recommendations
- Add a comprehensive README.md explaining purpose, setup, usage, and architecture
- Add a LICENSE file (MIT recommended for open source)
Security & Health
4.3h
Tech Debt (C)
A
OWASP (100%)
PASS
Quality Gate
A
Risk (2)
Methodology: Repobility · https://repobility.com/research/state-of-ai-code-2026/
Unknown
License
4.7%
Duplication
Languages
Frameworks
pytest
Concepts (1)
| Category | Name | Description | Confidence | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Repobility · severity-and-effort ranking · https://repobility.com | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| auto_category | Testing | testing | 70% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Embed Badge
Add to your README:
