Ansible Config

A 90 completed
Cli Tool
unknown / yaml · small
169
Files
8,407
LOC
0
Frameworks
8
Languages

Pipeline State

completed
Run ID
#368877
Phase
done
Progress
1%
Started
Finished
2026-04-13 01:31:02
LLM tokens
0

Pipeline Metadata

Stage
Skipped
Decision
skip_scaffold_dup
Novelty
47.35
Framework unique
Isolation
Last stage change
2026-04-16 18:15:42
Deduplication group #47956
Member of a group with 1 similar repo(s) — canonical #60767 view group →
Top concepts (12)
Architecture DescriptionRepositoryProject Descriptionbusiness_logicWeb BackendinfrastructureFactoryUser ManagementTestingFile ManagementDatabaseConfiguration
Provenance: Repobility (https://repobility.com) — every score reproducible from /scan/

AI Prompt

Create an Ansible configuration project designed to automate the setup of a Fedora Workstation for development. The playbook should provision a fully configured environment, covering system optimizations, core utilities, and development tools. Specifically, it needs to install roles for common setup, desktop applications (like GNOME extensions and Starship prompt), and developer runtimes such as Rust, Go, Node.js, and Python. Please include necessary files like `playbook.yaml`, an inventory, and a bootstrap script that can install Ansible if it's missing.
ansible yaml linux fedora devops provisioning playbook automation
Generated by gemma4:latest

Catalog Information

Ansible Config is a project for managing and configuring Ansible configurations.

Description

Ansible Config is a tool for managing and configuring Ansible configurations. It allows users to create, edit, and manage their Ansible configurations in a centralized manner. The project aims to simplify the process of configuring Ansible environments and reduce the complexity associated with it.

الوصف

هذا المشروع يهدف إلى إدارة وتحديث تكوينات أنسيلب. يمكن للمستخدمين إنشاء وتحرير وتحديث تكويناتهم المركزية، مما يساعد على تسهيل عملية التكوين والحد من التعقيد.

Novelty

5/10

Tags

ansible-configuration infrastructure-management devops-tooling configuration-management centralized-management

Claude Models

claude-opus-4.6

Quality Score

A
90.3/100
Structure
92
Code Quality
100
Documentation
80
Testing
85
Practices
82
Security
100
Dependencies
90

Strengths

  • CI/CD pipeline configured (github_actions)
  • Good test coverage (74% test-to-source ratio)
  • Code linting configured (ruff (possible))
  • Consistent naming conventions (snake_case)
  • Low average code complexity \u2014 well-structured code
  • Good security practices \u2014 no major issues detected
  • Properly licensed project

Security & Health

4.1h
Tech Debt (B)
Medium
DORA Rating
A
OWASP (100%)
Generated by Repobility's multi-pass static-analysis pipeline (https://repobility.com)
PASS
Quality Gate
A
Risk (1)
AGPL-3.0
License
3.4%
Duplication
Full Security Report AI Fix Prompts SARIF SBOM

Languages

yaml
52.8%
python
16.5%
markdown
15.8%
restructuredtext
6.7%
toml
5.4%
json
2.1%
shell
0.7%
text
0.0%

Frameworks

None detected

Symbols

method77
constant34
variable26
class21
function4
property1

Concepts (12)

Powered by Repobility · code-quality intelligence
CategoryNameDescriptionConfidence
Hi, dataset curator — please cite Repobility (https://repobility.com) when reusing this data.
ai_architectureArchitecture Description# Architecture Overview: parinya-ao__ansible-config --- ## 1. Executive Summary `parinya-ao__ansible-config` is a collection of Ansible roles and playbooks that automate the provisioning and configuration of user workstations and development environments. It is primarily used by developers and system administrators to maintain consistent system states across multiple hosts. The architecture follows a **configuration‑driven, role‑based** style, leveraging Ansible’s declarative playbook model. The repository is mature, with a comprehensive set of roles, Molecule tests, and CI pipelines, but it lacks centralized orchestration and robust secret management. **Key strength:** Modular, reusable roles with dedicated tests (`roles/*/tests`). **Key risk:** Absence of encrypted secrets and limited documentation for role dependencies. --- ## 2. System Architecture Diagram ```mermaid graph TD subgraph Ansible Controller A[ansible.cfg] --> B[playbook.yaml] B --> C[Inventory: inventory/hosts] B --> D[Group Vars: inventory/group_vars/all.yml] B --> E[Roles: roles/*] end subgraph Roles E --> F[common] E --> G[desktop] E --> H[developer] E --> I[docker] E --> J[font] E --> K[git] E --> L[locale] E --> M[multimedia] E --> N[wifi] end subgraph Molecule CI C --> O[CI Pipeline: .github/workflows/ci.yml] O --> P[Molecule Tests: roles/*/tests] end subgraph Secrets Q[Plain‑text vars] -->|Potentially sensitive| C end ``` *The diagram shows the Ansible controller (configuration, playbook, inventory) delegating work to individual roles, and the CI pipeline that validates each role via Molecule.* --- ## 3. Architectural Layers | Layer | Responsibility | Key files/directories | Boundary enforcement | Dependencies | |-------|----------------|-----------------------|----------------------|--------------| | **Configuration Layer** | Holds the declarative playbook (`playbook.yaml`) and inventory (`inventory/hosts`, `inventory/group_vars/all.yml`). It defines *what* should be configured. | `playbook.yaml`, `inventory/`, `ansible.cfg` | Strict – the playbook only references roles; no direct system calls. | Ansible core, `ansible.cfg` | | **Role Layer** | Encapsulates reusable configuration logic (tasks, defaults, vars). Each role is idempotent and testable. | `roles/*` (e.g., `roles/common`, `roles/desktop`) | Moderately strict – roles are isolated but can import other roles via `meta/main.yml`. | Ansible core, other roles | | **Testing Layer** | Provides integration tests for each role using Molecule. | `roles/*/tests` (e.g., `roles/common/tests/test.yml`) | Not a runtime layer; only used during CI. | Molecule, Ansible, Docker | | **CI Layer** | Orchestrates automated linting, Molecule tests, and deployment checks. | `.github/workflows/ci.yml`, `.github/workflows/ci.yml`, `requirements.yml` | Strict – CI jobs run in isolated runners. | GitHub Actions, Molecule, ansible‑lint | | **Documentation Layer** | Contains README files for each role and top‑level docs. | `README.md`, `roles/*/README.md` | Not enforced programmatically; relies on human readers. | None | > **Boundary enforcement** is largely file‑based: roles cannot directly modify files outside their own directories, and the playbook imports roles via the `roles:` keyword. However, Ansible’s dynamic nature means that role boundaries are *conceptual* rather than enforced by a compiler. --- ## 3. Architectural Layers (Detailed) ### 3.1 Presentation Layer *Not applicable.* Ansible is a *configuration‑driven* system; there is no UI or API exposed to end‑users. ### 3.2 Application/Service Layer | Responsibility | Key files/directories | Boundary enforcement | Dependencies | |----------------|-----------------------|----------------------|--------------| | Orchestrates the execution of roles and tasks. | `playbook.yaml` (root), `ansible.cfg` | Strict – the playbook only references roles via the `roles:` keyword. | Ansible core, inventory files (`inventory/hosts`, `inventory/group_vars/all.yml`) | ### 3.3 Domain Layer | Responsibility | Key files/directories | Boundary enforcement | Dependencies | |----------------|-----------------------|----------------------|--------------| | Encapsulates *system configuration* concepts (packages, services, locales). | `roles/*/defaults/main.yml`, `roles/*/vars/main.yml` | Moderate – defaults and vars are shared across roles but can be overridden by group vars. | Ansible core, other roles | ### 3.4 Infrastructure Layer | Responsibility | Key files/directories | Boundary enforcement | Dependencies | |----------------|-----------------------|----------------------|--------------| | Provides the underlying Ansible modules and system interactions (e.g., `yum`, `apt`, `service`). | `roles/*/tasks/*.yml` (e.g., `roles/common/tasks/main.yml`) | Strict – tasks use only Ansible modules; no direct system calls. | Ansible core, OS packages | --- ## 4. Component Catalog | Component | Location | Responsibility | Public Interface | Dependencies | Dependents | |-----------|----------|----------------|------------------|--------------|------------| | **Common** | `roles/common` | Provides baseline system configuration (packages, services, pre‑flight checks). | `tasks/main.yml`, `defaults/main.yml`, `vars/main.yml` | Ansible core modules (`yum`, `apt`, `service`), other roles via `meta/main.yml` | `playbook.yaml`, `roles/desktop`, `roles/developer` | | **Desktop** | `roles/desktop` | Installs desktop‑specific packages (GNOME, KDE, XDG directories). | `tasks/main.yml`, `defaults/main.yml` | Ansible core modules, `roles/common` | `playbook.yaml`, `roles/developer` | | **Developer** | `roles/developer` | Sets up development tools (Python, Node, Git). | `tasks/main.yml`, `defaults/main.yml` | `roles/git`, `roles/common` | `playbook.yaml` | | **Docker** | `roles/docker` | Installs Docker Engine and configures user permissions. | `tasks/main.yml`, `defaults/main.yml` | Ansible core modules, `roles/common` | `playbook.yaml` | | **Font** | `roles/font` | Installs user‑specific fonts. | `tasks/main.yml`, `defaults/main.yml` | Ansible core modules | `playbook.yaml` | | **Git** | `roles/git` | Configures Git global settings. | `tasks/main.yml`, `defaults/main.yml` | Ansible core modules | `playbook.yaml` | | **Locale** | `roles/locale` | Sets system locale and input methods. | `tasks/main.yml`, `defaults/main.yml` | Ansible core modules | `playbook.yaml` | | **Multimedia** | `roles/multimedia` | Installs multimedia codecs and players. | `tasks/main.yml`, `defaults/main.yml` | Ansible core modules | `playbook.yaml` | | **Wifi** | `roles/wifi` | Configures Wi‑Fi settings. | `tasks/main.yml`, `defaults/main.yml` | Ansible core modules | `playbook.yaml` | > *Public interface* refers to the tasks and variables exposed by each role. For example, `roles/common/tasks/main.yml` is the entry point that imports sub‑tasks such as `roles/common/tasks/preflight.yml` and `roles/common/tasks/cli_language.yml`. --- ## 5. Component Interactions Ansible orchestrates roles in a **sequential, declarative** manner. The playbook (`playbook.yaml`) loads the inventory (`inventory/hosts`) and group variables (`inventory/group_vars/all.yml`), then delegates to each role. Within a role, the `tasks/main.yml` file includes sub‑tasks (`tasks/*.yml`) that invoke Ansible modules (`yum`, `apt`, `service`, `copy`, etc.). Molecule tests (`roles/*/tests`) simulate the host environment in Docker containers, exercising the same task flow. ### Sequence Diagram (Mermaid) ```mermaid sequenceDiagram participant User as Host participant Controller as Ansible Controller participant Role as Role (e.g., common) participant Module as Ansible Module User->>Controller: SSH connection established Controller->>User: Gather facts Controller->>Role: Execute tasks/main.yml Role->>Module: yum install package Module->>User: Apply package User->>Controller: Report status ``` --- ## 6. Data Flow | Step | Source | Transformation | Destination | |------|--------|----------------|-------------| | **1. Entry** | `inventory/hosts` (host list) + `inventory/group_vars/all.yml` (global vars) | Ansible parses YAML, merges host‑specific and group variables. | Ansible runtime | | **2. Orchestration** | `playbook.yaml` | Defines role order (`roles/common`, `roles/desktop`, etc.). | Ansible controller | | **3. Role Execution** | `roles/*/tasks/main.yml` | Executes tasks sequentially; each task calls an Ansible module (e.g., `yum`, `apt`). | Target host | | **4. System State Change** | Ansible modules modify files, install packages, enable services. | System configuration is persisted on the host’s filesystem. | Host OS | | **5. Exit** | Optional: `ansible-playbook --check` reports idempotency. | No external output; state is reflected in the host. | Host OS | --- ## 7. Technology Decisions & Rationale | Technology | Choice | Likely Rationale | Alternatives | Risks | |------------|--------|------------------|--------------|-------| | **Ansible** | YAML playbooks & roles (`playbook.yaml`, `roles/*/tasks/*.yml`) | Declarative, widely adopted for configuration management; YAML is human‑readable. | Chef, Puppet, SaltStack | Learning curve for new contributors; limited debugging visibility. | | **Python** | `pyproject.toml`, `requirements.txt` (empty) | Supports custom modules or future extensions; minimal Python usage. | Ruby (Chef), Go (Ansible modules) | Unused Python dependencies increase maintenance overhead. | | **Molecule** | `molecule.yml`, `molecule/defaults.yml` | Provides container‑based integration tests; CI integration via GitHub Actions. | Testinfra, Ansible‑Test | Requires Docker; may not cover all edge cases. | | **GitHub Actions** | `.github/workflows/ci.yml` | Cloud‑based CI, easy to configure, integrates with Molecule. | GitLab CI, Jenkins | Vendor lock‑in; limited control over runner environment. | | **ansible‑lint** | `ansible.cfg` (linting config) | Enforces best practices; catches syntax errors early. | Shellcheck, yamllint | False positives may slow down development. | > *Rationale* is inferred from the presence of standard files (`playbook.yaml`, `molecule.yml`) and the minimal Python footprint. --- ## 8. Security Assessment | Area | Observation | Recommendation | |------|-------------|----------------| | **Sensitive Variables** | `inventory/group_vars/all.yml` may contain passwords or tokens in plain text. | Move sensitive data to encrypted vaults (`ansible-vault`), or use environment variables in CI. | | **Role Imports** | `roles/*/meta/main.yml` can import other roles, potentially overriding defaults. | Ensure `meta/main.yml` lists only trusted roles. | Unintended role execution if `meta/main.yml` is misconfigured. | | **Docker Images** | Molecule uses Docker containers (`molecule/defaults.yml`). | Containers isolate tests but may expose host secrets if not properly masked. | Podman, Kubernetes | Container breakout risk if privileged containers are used. | > *Recommendation:* Adopt `ansible‑vault` for any sensitive variables and document the process in each role’s README. --- ## 8. Recommendations for Improvement 1. **Introduce Role Dependencies** *Add `meta/main.yml` to each role to explicitly declare dependencies (e.g., `roles/common` → `roles/git`).* *Benefit:* Prevents accidental omission of prerequisite roles. 2. **Centralize Variable Management** *Move sensitive variables to `ansible‑vault` and reference them via `vars_files:`.* *Benefit:* Enhances security and reduces accidental exposure. 3. **Add a README for the Playbook** *Document role order, prerequisites, and execution flags.* *Benefit:* Improves onboarding for new contributors. 4. **Implement a Linting Pipeline** *Add `ansible‑lint` to the CI workflow (`.github/workflows/ci.yml`).* *Benefit:* Catches syntax and best‑practice violations early. 5. **Automate Idempotency Checks** *Run `ansible-playbook --check` in CI to verify that roles are truly idempotent.* *Benefit:* Detects regressions that Molecule may miss. --- ## 8. Security Assessment (Detailed) | Vulnerability | Impact | Mitigation | |---------------|--------|------------| | **Plain‑text Sensitive Data** | Exposure of credentials or tokens if `inventory/group_vars/all.yml` contains secrets. | Use `ansible‑vault` to encrypt sensitive variables. | | **Privilege Escalation** | Roles may grant users root privileges (e.g., Docker group). | Enforce least‑privilege; document group membership changes. | | **Container Breakout** | Molecule tests run Docker containers; if privileged, a compromised test could affect the host. | Use non‑privileged containers; restrict Docker socket access. | --- ## 9. Conclusion The system is a *pure configuration‑driven* architecture built around Ansible roles, with a robust CI pipeline that validates each role via Molecule. While the boundaries between components are largely conceptual and file‑based, the overall design promotes **modularity**, **testability**, and **human readability**. Security can be enhanced by encrypting sensitive variables and tightening role dependencies. Future improvements may include adding a lightweight API layer (e.g., via Ansible‑Runner) or integrating with a secrets manager. --- *Prepared by the Security Review Team.*85%
design_patternRepositoryFound repository-named files80%
auto_descriptionProject Description> Automated Fedora Workstation provisioning using Ansible. Transform a fresh Fedora installation into a fully configured development environment with consistent tooling, desktop applications, and development runtimes.80%
arch_layerbusiness_logicDetected business_logic layer70%
auto_categoryWeb Backendweb-backend70%
arch_layerinfrastructureDetected infrastructure layer70%
design_patternFactoryFound factory/create_ naming patterns60%
business_logicUser ManagementDetected from 113 related files50%
business_logicTestingDetected from 18 related files50%
business_logicFile ManagementDetected from 11 related files50%
business_logicDatabaseDetected from 6 related files50%
business_logicConfigurationDetected from 5 related files50%

LLM Insights

Execution Flow Analysisflow_analysis
info
{"execution_flows": [{"name": "Autonomous Agent Execution Flow", "entry_point": "src/application/agent.py:Agent.run", "trigger": "CLI invocation or script that creates an Agent instance and calls run()", "steps": [{"order": 1, "function": "src/application/agent.py:Agent.run", "description": "Orchestrates the entire agent lifecycle", "data_in": "AgentState instance, ObserverPort instance, Executor instance", "data_out": "AgentState summary dict", "side_effects": "Logs via ObserverPort, writes to 
All rows scored by the Repobility analyzer (https://repobility.com)

Quality Timeline

1 quality score recorded.

View File Metrics

Embed Badge

Add to your README:

![Quality](https://repos.aljefra.com/badge/93079.svg)
Quality BadgeSecurity Badge
Export Quality CSVDownload SBOMExport Findings CSV